Antioxidant and physicochemical properties of hydrogen peroxide-treated sugar beet dietary fibre

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2016-05

Authors

Mišan, Aleksandra orcid-logo
Sakač, Marijana orcid-logo
Medić, Đorđe
Tadić, Vanja
Marković, Goran
Gyura, Julliana
Pagano, Ester
Izzo, Angelo A.
Borrelli, Francesca
Šarić, Bojana orcid-logo

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

WILEY

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to examine if hydrogen peroxide treatment of sugar beet fibre that aimed at improving its physicochemical properties would impair its antioxidant potential. Three different sugar beet fibres were obtained from sugar beet – non-treated fibre (NTF) from sugar beet cossettes extracted with sulphurous acid, treated fibre (TF) from NTF treated with hydrogen peroxide in alkaline solution and commercially available Fibrex®. The antioxidant activity of extractable and non-extractable fibre fractions in ethanol/water mixture (80:20, v/v) of three fibre samples was estimated. Non-extractable fractions obtained after alkaline treatment of investigated fibres were much higher in phenolic compounds and possessed higher antioxidant potential than extractable fractions. Ferulic acid was proven to be the dominant phenolic acid. Regarding both extractable and non-extractable fractions, Fibrex® had the highest antioxidant activity in chemical tests, while NTF was superior in comparison with TF. Based on the results of Caco-2 cells-based test, all non-extractable fractions possessed potential for reactive oxygen species inhibition. Regarding the extractable fractions, only the TF manifested this effect.

Description

peer-reviewed

Keywords

sugar beet fibre, antioxidant activity, non-treated fibre, treated fibre, Fibrex®, Caco-2 cell assay

Citation

A. Mišan, M. Sakač, Đ. Medić, V. Tadić, G. Marković, J. Gyura, E. Pagano, A.A. Izzo, F. Borrelli, F., B. Šarić, I. Milovanović, N. Milić. Antioxidant and physicochemical properties of hydrogen peroxide-treated sugar beet dietary fibre. Phytotherapy Research, 30 (2016) 855–860. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5598