Effect of processing and cooking on mineral and phytic acid content of buckwheat-enriched tagliatelle

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2016-05

Authors

Jambrec, Dubravka
Sakač, Marijana orcid-logo
Jovanov, Pavle orcid-logo
Mišan, Aleksandra orcid-logo
Pestorić, Mladenka orcid-logo
Tomović, Vladimir
Mandić, Anamarija orcid-logo

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Savez hemijskih inženjera Srbije

Abstract

Two types of buckwheat flour – non-treated (NBF) and autoclaved (TBF) – were used for the enrichment of whole wheat tagliatelle (control sample) at the level of 10–30%, and the produced tagliatelle samples (dry and cooked) were examined in terms of mineral and phytic acid (PA) content. Both NBF and TBF possessed significantly higher (p < 0.05) content of all investigated minerals compared to whole wheat flour (WWF), but significantly lower (p < 0.05) PA content. Cooked NBF-containing tagliatelle possessed significantly higher (p < 0.05) content of Mg, Zn, Mn and Fe compared to the cooked control sample, while mineral content of cooked TBF-containing tagliatelle samples was not significantly different from the control. Autoclaving significantly reduced (p < 0.05) PA content of cooked TBF-containing tagliatelle samples compared to cooked NBF-containing tagliatelle samples and the control sample. The mineral bioavailability defined through molar ratio of mineral to phytate was slightly improved in buckwheat-containing tagliatelle samples, but it still remains at low level. Regarding all results, the enrichment of whole wheat tagliatelle with NBF at higher levels of substitution (20–30%) resulted in significant increase in mineral content and bioavailability.

Description

peer-reviewed

Keywords

mineral content, phytic acid, buckwheat, tagliatelle, mineral bioavailability, autoclaving

Citation

D. Jambrec, M. Sakač, P. Jovanov, A. Mišan, M. Pestorić, V. Tomović, A. Mandić. Effect of processing and cooking on mineral and phytic acid content of buckwheat-enriched tagliatelle. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 22 (2016) 319−326. DOI: 10.2298/CICEQ150709046J.